Select language: NL - FR
		home > references > case study 6 Industrial rope access vs. scaffolding for surveys Client: Szerelmey Plc. For: Sloane Court West, Chelsea, London                                  The brief was as follows:   Full visual and photo survey Make safe, removal of defective render Full survey report on hard copy and CD-Rom   Options: Scaffolding or Rope Access TASK Scaffolding   Erection 34 hours   Task 50 hours   Dismantle 21 hour Vital Access   Set up 4 hours   Task 60 hours   Clear 1 hour TOTAL 105 hours 65 hours This is a saving of over 35%!   Value This was a relatively simple task, but for the fact that the front elevation was over a busy pavement. Some render had already fallen, leaving the client keen to remove any further loose material before anybody came to harm, and to discover the depth of the problem.   Not only does rope access not require pavement permits (unlike scaffolding), but our ability to complete the contract with the minimum of disturbance to the tenants in the block was another key factor.   We were more effective in every way than the alternatives, and our speed of response has no rival.   "Thanks for coming so quickly, we were very worried about more things falling down."   Tenant of building to the Team Supervisor. Consult our references or view another case study to see how best rope access can benefit your needs.   Please contact us for a no obligation consultation.
Home Services we offer: Commercial services Residential services Our references More information: About rope access Case studies FAQ Contact us About us Jobs at Vital Access
Vital Access+44 (0)20 7720 7922info@vitalaccess.co.uk